<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crenk &#187; rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crenk.com/tag/rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crenk.com</link>
	<description>Web Apps, Mobile Apps and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Pagerank Predictors Havent Been Working For Long Times, Maybe Business Opportunity!</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/google-pagerank-predictors-havent-been-working-for-long-times-maybe-business-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://crenk.com/google-pagerank-predictors-havent-been-working-for-long-times-maybe-business-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably more than six months ago now I noticed that iWebTool&#8217;s Google Pagerank predictor stopped working correctly. I know that no one has really reported about this issue but it just a well known fact that it no longer works. However, it really makes me wonder why no one has actually contacted Google and tried [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably more than six months ago now I noticed that <a href="http://www.iwebtool.com/pagerank_prediction" target="_blank">iWebTool&#8217;s Google Pagerank predictor</a> stopped working correctly. I know that no one has really reported about this issue but it just a well known fact that it no longer works. However, it really makes me wonder why no one has actually contacted Google and tried to get this service back up and running. Google Pagerank is know for providing a basic authority ranking for their search engine, these days it probably has not as much affect on search results as it previously had, but it is still very important. Can someone get this back up and working!!
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/how-search-works-for-dummies/" title="How Search Works for Dummies">How Search Works for Dummies</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/youtube-off-site-video-players-now-have-search-option-plus-new-google-image-search-tool/" title="YouTube Off Site Video Players Now Have Search Option. Plus New Google Image Search Tool">YouTube Off Site Video Players Now Have Search Option. Plus New Google Image Search Tool</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/technorati-media-launches-their-adengage-product-just-a-poor-advertising-network/" title="Technorati Media Launches Their AdEngage Product. Just a Poor Advertising Network">Technorati Media Launches Their AdEngage Product. Just a Poor Advertising Network</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/powerset-launches-a-wikipedia-search-tool/" title="Powerset Launches a Wikipedia Search Tool">Powerset Launches a Wikipedia Search Tool</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/top-12-torrent-sites-of-2009/" title="Top 12 Torrent Sites of 2009">Top 12 Torrent Sites of 2009</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crenk.com/google-pagerank-predictors-havent-been-working-for-long-times-maybe-business-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexa Ratings Algorithm Changed</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/alexa-ratings-algorithm-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://crenk.com/alexa-ratings-algorithm-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It has been reported by the guys over at Techcrunch that Alexa has changed the algorithm for their ratings. Alexa announced that they are pulling in more sources than just the Alexa toolbar and that they have also improved their methodology.
This has all come as a pleasant change. For a long time Alexa has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="vertical-align: top;" src="http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/alexa.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="57" /></p>
<p>It has been reported by the guys over at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/16/alexa-overhauls-ranking-system/" target="_blank">Techcrunch</a> that <a href="http://alexa.com" target="_blank">Alexa</a> has changed the algorithm for their ratings. Alexa <a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/company/announcement" target="_blank">announced</a> that they are pulling in more sources than just the Alexa toolbar and that they have also improved their methodology.</p>
<p>This has all come as a pleasant change. For a long time Alexa has been criticized because of their ratings and the fact that they are just completely made up and not really relevant. There has been a lot of sites that have take a huge hit, main example is <a href="http://dailyblogtips.com" target="_blank">DailyBlogTips</a>.</p>
<p>In the race for providing the most accurate stats of websites for free, I still think Compete and Quantcast are a long way ahead of Alexa, but these changes might make a huge change in how relevant the popularity numbers actually are.
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/hacker-news-blocks-all-search-engines/" title="Hacker News Blocks All Search Engines">Hacker News Blocks All Search Engines</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/rate-it-all-wants-to-let-your-business-build-your-own-foursquare-app/" title="Rate It All: Wants To Let Your Business Build Your Own Foursquare App">Rate It All: Wants To Let Your Business Build Your Own Foursquare App</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/google-by-numbers/" title="Google By Numbers">Google By Numbers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/apple-ipad-may-experience-limited-availability-upon-launch/" title="Apple iPad May Experience Limited Availability Upon Launch">Apple iPad May Experience Limited Availability Upon Launch</a></li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/diggs-traffic-slump/" title="Digg&#8217;s Traffic Slump">Digg&#8217;s Traffic Slump</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crenk.com/alexa-ratings-algorithm-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
