<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crenk Technology &#187; rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crenk.com/tag/rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crenk.com</link>
	<description>Web Apps, Mobile Apps and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Google Panda Got It Wrong! Scrapers Out Ranking Original Content: Crenk Example</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/2011/05/18/google-panda-got-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://crenk.com/2011/05/18/google-panda-got-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crenk News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crenk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=16881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are thousands of blogs that have been effected by Google&#8217;s recent Panda update. After viewing the 3,300 comments on this article via the Google Help Forum it seems as though they dont caremuch about feedback on their results. I wanted to write a quick article here on Crenk to show how Google&#8217;s Panda update [...]<p><a href="http://crenk.com/2011/05/18/google-panda-got-it-wrong/">Google Panda Got It Wrong! Scrapers Out Ranking Original Content: Crenk Example</a> originally appeared on: <a href="http://crenk.com">Crenk</a>
<br>
Join our Community: <a href="http://twitter.com/crenk">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://facebook.com/crenkcommunity">Facebook</a> 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are thousands of blogs that have been effected by Google&#8217;s recent Panda update. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=76830633df82fd8e&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=76830633df82fd8e0004a38a660cf507" target="_blank">After viewing the 3,300 comments on this article via the Google Help Forum</a> it seems as though they dont caremuch about feedback on their results.</p>
<p>I wanted to write a quick article here on Crenk to show how Google&#8217;s Panda update has hurt our site. I&#8217;m hoping that someone from Google actually reads this article and notices that there is still a big issue here!</p>
<p>Yesterday one of our authors wrote an amazing how to article titled: <a href="http://crenk.com/how-to-download-and-burn-hulu-movie-to-dvd/" target="_blank">How to Download and Burn Hulu Movie to DVD</a>.</p>
<p>The article is completely original, it&#8217;s over 400 words in length and provides a detailed step by step guide. This article is the epitome of original content!</p>
<p>I wanted to see where this article was actually ranking within Google for the keywords: <strong>burn hulu movie to dvd.</strong></p>
<p>I would have thought that the original Crenk article would have been in the top 50 at least. However, after searching the top 100 article we didn&#8217;t appear. Bad times!</p>
<p>Then, I discovered that 4 websites scraping our content are ranking within the top 100, one even ranks just outside the top 10. How is this providing good search results?</p>
<p>It would be great if someone from Google could please take a look and let us know why this is happening!</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-16882" title="google panda crenk" src="http://crenk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/google-panda-crenk-577x517.png" alt="" width="577" height="517" /></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong>
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/2011/07/14/crenk-still-being-punished-by-google-for-no-reason/" title="Crenk Still Being Punished by Google for NO REASON!">Crenk Still Being Punished by Google for NO REASON!</a> &#8211; July 14, 2011</li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/2011/02/28/google-crenk-isnt-a-content-farm/" title="Google: Crenk Isnt a Content Farm! ">Google: Crenk Isnt a Content Farm! </a> &#8211; February 28, 2011</li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/2011/02/02/blekko-starts-blocking-content-farms-from-their-search-engines/" title="Blekko Starts Blocking Content Farms from their Search Engines">Blekko Starts Blocking Content Farms from their Search Engines</a> &#8211; February 2, 2011</li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/2009/12/22/yelp-walks-away-from-googles-half-a-billion-dollars/" title="Yelp Walks Away from Google&#8217;s Half a Billion Dollars">Yelp Walks Away from Google&#8217;s Half a Billion Dollars</a> &#8211; December 22, 2009</li>
<li><a href="http://crenk.com/2009/07/02/monitoring-your-search-engines-positions/" title="Monitoring your Search Engines Positions">Monitoring your Search Engines Positions</a> &#8211; July 2, 2009</li>
</ul>
<img src="http://crenk.com/5d26c88b/266bb3dc/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" /><p><a href="http://crenk.com/2011/05/18/google-panda-got-it-wrong/">Google Panda Got It Wrong! Scrapers Out Ranking Original Content: Crenk Example</a> originally appeared on: <a href="http://crenk.com">Crenk</a>
<br>
Join our Community: <a href="http://twitter.com/crenk">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://facebook.com/crenkcommunity">Facebook</a> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crenk.com/2011/05/18/google-panda-got-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

