<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iGoogle gets facelift, for the worse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/</link>
	<description>Web Apps, Mobile Apps and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randomn3ss &#187; Google finally describes the new iGoogle features</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-12014</link>
		<dc:creator>Randomn3ss &#187; Google finally describes the new iGoogle features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-12014</guid>
		<description>[...] weeks ago my favorite home page and RSS reader iGoogle got a facelift, for the worse in my opinion.  Unsually, Google made no official announcement of it, that changed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFE1F3; padding: 1em">[...] weeks ago my favorite home page and RSS reader iGoogle got a facelift, for the worse in my opinion.  Unsually, Google made no official announcement of it, that changed [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randomn3ss &#187; Time to say goodbye, I&#8217;m cleaning house</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-11926</link>
		<dc:creator>Randomn3ss &#187; Time to say goodbye, I&#8217;m cleaning house</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-11926</guid>
		<description>[...] been touting my love for the iGoogle custom homepage, it works and works well, minus the recent facelift for the worse that it has undergone.  For as long as tabs have been enabled on it I&#8217;ve kept my feeds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFE1F3; padding: 1em">[...] been touting my love for the iGoogle custom homepage, it works and works well, minus the recent facelift for the worse that it has undergone.  For as long as tabs have been enabled on it I&#8217;ve kept my feeds [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iGoogle users revolt, want old design back</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-11460</link>
		<dc:creator>iGoogle users revolt, want old design back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-11460</guid>
		<description>[...] than a week after iGoogle had a facelift for the worse, die-hard users have started to revolt.  Like myself, many other users have complained about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFE1F3; padding: 1em">[...] than a week after iGoogle had a facelift for the worse, die-hard users have started to revolt.  Like myself, many other users have complained about the [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-11301</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-11301</guid>
		<description>I read about a site on John Chow today called http://www.43marks.com - its like Igoogle but better cuz you can add you own bookmarks and the bookmarks can be websites not just gadgets and RSS feeds although you can upload your favorite RSS feeds too. Its free and totally customizable. Plus you don&#039;t have to login to see your bookmars and RSS feeds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about a site on John Chow today called <a href="http://www.43marks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.43marks.com</a> &#8211; its like Igoogle but better cuz you can add you own bookmarks and the bookmarks can be websites not just gadgets and RSS feeds although you can upload your favorite RSS feeds too. Its free and totally customizable. Plus you don&#8217;t have to login to see your bookmars and RSS feeds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Panic</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Panic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-11279</guid>
		<description>@Jen - Sorry for the confusion, iGoogle is essentially Google Reader now.  If a blog publisher chooses to publish their full feed, it shows up in iGoogle almost the same as Google reader.  Personally, I&#039;ve tried out about a half dozen RSS readers and honestly prefer to still read content on the original site, I use iGoogle to keep track of sites with RSS feeds that I enjoy to read so that I don&#039;t have to visit a site several times a day to see what the new articles are, I can simply click on the articles I want to read, when I want to read them.

You are also right regarding wanting people to read what I (or any blogger) writes, the offset to that is nearly all blogs are funded by advertisers.  More views to the actual site = more money from advertisers, most people don&#039;t advertise via RSS or do it very sparingly, which makes it more appealing to a reader because they don&#039;t have to sift through ads to get to the content.  It&#039;s a two sided sword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jen &#8211; Sorry for the confusion, iGoogle is essentially Google Reader now.  If a blog publisher chooses to publish their full feed, it shows up in iGoogle almost the same as Google reader.  Personally, I&#8217;ve tried out about a half dozen RSS readers and honestly prefer to still read content on the original site, I use iGoogle to keep track of sites with RSS feeds that I enjoy to read so that I don&#8217;t have to visit a site several times a day to see what the new articles are, I can simply click on the articles I want to read, when I want to read them.</p>
<p>You are also right regarding wanting people to read what I (or any blogger) writes, the offset to that is nearly all blogs are funded by advertisers.  More views to the actual site = more money from advertisers, most people don&#8217;t advertise via RSS or do it very sparingly, which makes it more appealing to a reader because they don&#8217;t have to sift through ads to get to the content.  It&#8217;s a two sided sword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-11264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-11264</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never used iGoogle, so I&#039;m missing something. Can&#039;t you just replace iGoogle in &quot;If you choose to publish your whole RSS feed, you have now have potentially lost unique visitors to your site, they can read it all right here in iGoogle.&quot; with &quot;RSS Reader X&quot;? If you have a full feed and I subscribe in Google Reader, I will read it... did iGoogle do things differently? (I also can&#039;t understand why someone would prefer reading articles on the original site rather than a reader, but that&#039;s just me.)

As for the question: I rarely *unsubscribe* from a feed because it&#039;s partial, but unless the excerpt is really interesting I just don&#039;t click the link. If I realize I never click the links, I unsubscribe.

The way I see it, it depends on what you want: numbers or people reading what you write? If you want your stats counter to go crazy, put a partial feed and be prepared for pissed off people (but potentially more profit); if you want to keep your readers happy, be ready to lose some potential money. But I suppose you knew that :P As a reader of blogs in general, I will always prefer full feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never used iGoogle, so I&#8217;m missing something. Can&#8217;t you just replace iGoogle in &#8220;If you choose to publish your whole RSS feed, you have now have potentially lost unique visitors to your site, they can read it all right here in iGoogle.&#8221; with &#8220;RSS Reader X&#8221;? If you have a full feed and I subscribe in Google Reader, I will read it&#8230; did iGoogle do things differently? (I also can&#8217;t understand why someone would prefer reading articles on the original site rather than a reader, but that&#8217;s just me.)</p>
<p>As for the question: I rarely *unsubscribe* from a feed because it&#8217;s partial, but unless the excerpt is really interesting I just don&#8217;t click the link. If I realize I never click the links, I unsubscribe.</p>
<p>The way I see it, it depends on what you want: numbers or people reading what you write? If you want your stats counter to go crazy, put a partial feed and be prepared for pissed off people (but potentially more profit); if you want to keep your readers happy, be ready to lose some potential money. But I suppose you knew that <img src='http://crenk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  As a reader of blogs in general, I will always prefer full feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR</title>
		<link>http://crenk.com/igoogle-gets-facelift-for-the-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-11250</link>
		<dc:creator>RR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crenk.com/?p=1158#comment-11250</guid>
		<description>It sucks.  I hate when software or web designers assume that everyone wants the exact same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sucks.  I hate when software or web designers assume that everyone wants the exact same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
